Home » Truth Movement

Fourth Plane Shot Down on 9/11

23 July 2008 Comments Written by: Andrew S.

I remember a couple of years back telling my friends who were on their way to see United 93 that it was pure propaganda and not believe a word of it. They replied in disbelief and questioned my assertion, but I quickly replied that the movie was released just five years after the events of 9/11 and that we were still in the midst of a war started on the premise that terrorists from Saudi Arabia attacked us. Then we invaded Afghanistan and Iraq. Well United 93 is propaganda simply because it supports the official story. True or not, it’s still propaganda. Now we have even more evidence that all is not as it seemed. Read about it in this excellent article:

Navy Prosecutor In Gitmo Case: fourth plane shot down

“Bin Laden driver” case contains revealing details

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Though the trial the man, dubbed “Osama bin Laden’s driver”, is primarily functioning as a show piece for the Bush administration’s “war on terror”, some interesting information emerged from the Guantanamo Bay naval base yesterday in the form of a direct admission from a US prosecutor that the fourth plane was “shot down”.

The revelation came during assertions from representatives for the prosecution that Salim Hamdan had detailed knowledge of the intended target of the fourth hijacked plane on 9/11.

A Reuters report states:

…prosecutor Timothy Stone told the six-member jury of U.S. military officers who will decide Hamdan’s guilt or innocence that Hamdan had inside knowledge of the 2001 attacks on the United States because he overheard a conversation between bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri.

“If they hadn’t shot down the fourth plane it would’ve hit the dome,” Stone, a Navy officer, said in his opening remarks.

The tribunal’s chief prosecutor, Col. Lawrence Morris, later explained that Stone was quoting Hamdan in evidence that will be presented at trial. Morris declined to say if the “dome” was a reference to the U.S. Capitol.

The report goes on to state “United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in a field in rural Pennsylvania. U.S. officials have never stated it was shot down although rumors saying that abound to this day.”

Were Stone’s words a “slip of the tongue” in the vain of former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld’s when he also told reporters that flight 93 was shot down?

Flight 93 had an 8 mile wide debris field, a fact that does not tally with official story that the aircraft was fully intact in the seconds before it hit the ground.

Large pieces of fuselage were also recovered from a marina in Indian Lake, a couple of miles away from the crash site, and the planes engines, which according to the laws of physics should have plunged deep into the ground along with the rest of the airliner were never found.

Only a one-ton segment of an engine was ever recovered, again more than a mile from the crash site, which the FBI declared had ‘bounced’ there.

The wreckage from flight 93 remains under armed guard inside Iron Mountain.

Eyewitness accounts, in addition to one call from the flight, also describe loud engine noises, white smoke and parts falling from the flight as it approached its final resting place.

We have previously reported on credible individuals who claim to have personally talked with the pilots who shot the plane down.

How do you guys feel about this article? Did any of you previously suspect that flight 93 was shot down and do you have some links or articles that you could to suggest to us. Let us know!

Vote This Post DownVote This Post Up (+5 rating, 1 votes)
Loading ... Loading ...

Viewing 12 Comments

 

Trackbacks

(Trackback URL)

close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus