Home » Police State

Obama’s Youth is Worse Than Hitler Youth

18 July 2008 19 Comments Posted by: Andrew S.

If you think that the police state is bad now, just wait until Obama gets in power. He wants to put teenagers in charge of spying on your every action and they are going to be a million strong in number. What’s more, they are going to be heavily armed and funded! I agree with Alex Jones, that’s my line in the sand. No teenage punk with a gun is going to tell me what to do. We can’t let it come to this people.

Obama Calls For National Civilian Stasi

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Thursday, July 17, 2008

Presidential frontrunner Barack Obama has called for a “civilian national security force” as powerful as the U.S. military, comments that were ignored by the vast majority of the corporate media but compared by one journalist to the Nazi Hitler Youth.

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded,” Obama told a Colorado Springs audience earlier this month.

World Net Daily editor Joseph Farah asked if he was the only journalist in America who found Obama’s statement troubling.

“If we’re going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn’t this rather a big deal?” wrote Farah.

“Are we talking about creating a police state here? The U.S. Army alone has nearly 500,000 troops. That doesn’t count reserves or National Guard. In 2007, the U.S. Defense budget was $439 billion. Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it? What did he mean?”

KnoxNews.com is seemingly the only other media outlet to express interest in exactly what Obama is proposing.

“The statement was made in the context of youth service. Is this an organization for just the youth or are adults going to participate? How does one get away from the specter of other such “youth” organizations from Nazi Germany and the former Soviet Union when talking about it?” wrote Michael Silence.

Obama’s proposal smacks of an expanded version of an existing program in which hundreds of police, firefighters, paramedics and utility workers have been trained and recently dispatched as “Terrorism Liaison Officers” in Colorado, Arizona and California to watch for “suspicious activity” which is later fed into a secret government database.

It is also reminiscent of the supposedly canned 2002 Operation TIPS program, which would have turned 4 per cent of Americans into informants under the jurisdiction of the Justice Department.

TIPS lived on in other guises, such as the Highway Watch program, a $19 billion dollar Homeland Security-run project which trains truckers to watch for suspicious activity on America’s highways.

More recently, ABC News reported that “The FBI is taking cues from the CIA to recruit thousands of covert informants in the United States as part of a sprawling effort…..to aid with criminal investigations.”

Since authorities now define mundane activities like buying baby formula, beer, wearing Levi jeans, carrying identifying documents like a drivers license and traveling with women or children or mentioning the U.S. constitution as the behavior of potential terrorists, the bounty for the American Stasi to turn in political dissidents is sure to be too tempting to resist under Obama’s new program.

I think that the scariest part of all of this is how charismatic Obama is. Not only that, but anyone who attacks him on any point must be a right-winger, a racist or both. Nothing could be further from the truth. This isn’t Obama’s idea at all - it’s just classical tyranny on steroids. He’s just following the old model and updating it for the times. I’m plenty sure that if McCain is elected he’d think it is a pretty good idea, too.

Let me be clear: I do not support Obama. I do not support McCain. Our presidents run nothing - they just take orders.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Vote This Post DownVote This Post Up (7 rating, 3 votes)
Loading ... Loading ...

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

19 Comments »

  • Alicia O. said:

    That is pretty crazy Andrew, I will have to do more research on it. Now I see what made you so upset!

    Also, I think it’s important that you point out you neither support McCain or Obama…this isn’t an Obama bashing site, and anyone running across this article needs to realize that.

    People need to see around the false paradigm of party politics and left-right ideology.

    Andrew, I know that you don’t have all the answers but I would like to see and article that outlines a potential strategy for voters/Americans in the upcoming months before the Nov Elections.

    Are we all to abstain? Organize? Does anyone out there have anything to say on the topic of what the American people are to do now that we are faced with tyranny? What should we do in our everyday lives…?

    Again, I know that you don’t have these answers, but perhaps you could research what scholars or journalists are saying. I know Mises had an article about why a Revolution like the first would fail — are there any other articles?

  • veritas said:

    i think you mean commies and not so much fascist uprising.. look at china, spies everywhere. community surveillance is already happening, there needs to be boundaries and order to this, do you know how easy it is to hack into people’s email addresses, lives etc.

  • MEL said:

    I think that there are worse things to conjure up. You should probably be more concerned with our economy and the loss of jobs and the fact that maybe you are next. Lets not get freaked out lowering crime rates!

  • Andrew Slominski (author) said:

    Look MEL, I’m not ‘conjuring’ this up. These are Obama’s words. I hardly think we need a force as well funded as the military to fight crime here in the US.

  • DAISY_YANG said:

    Andrew, you are right again. We should not be spending so much on fighting crime, especially in areas like Rochester. I’ve always been a believer in “Gang Theory.” Let them fight it out, and kill themselves! As long as we never leave our homes, we’ll all be fine, and we’ll be far richer because our taxes will be lower (little to no police force). Think about it…

  • Andrew Slominski (author) said:

    Please don't associate me with the “Gang Theory”

    I was hardly saying we don't need police.

  • DAISY_YANG said:

    No, of course we NEED POLICE. I think you misunderstood my last point, which I was agreeing with you that “we don't need a force as well funded as the military to fight crime here in the U.S.” Crime in the U.S. isn't bad. Especially, for example, in our area. Why direct more funding towards law enforcement? Are we aiming to build a police state? I don't want to live and love in a police state, and I don't think you do either.

  • Common__Sense said:

    1) THIS IS RETARDED. Honestly, you want to compare Hitler youth's to Obama youth's!?

    2) The point is that a military force is no good at domestic peacekeeping. It's drawing a parallel, and begging the question, why don't we fund our police as well as our military?

    3) The joy of fear-mongering is that it is highly profitable. Alex Jones' is certainly making a ton “questioning” the establishment, while relishing the rewards of the system.

    FINALLY: http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Alex-Jones-sum...
    You claim rationality. Read that site, view all the underlying support. Explain to everyone how you can possibly believe this guy.

  • DAISY_YANG said:

    I don't understand the words you are saying as you have said them. Are you sure you are familiar enough with the English language to form sentences? Have you went to 5th grade? Were you eating paste while the others were learning their adjectives? Were you, sir? Were you?

    Also, before you call someone a “liar,” think about how that might make them FEEL. If Alex Jones happens to be reading this blog (which is entirely possible - the internet is a small place), how would he FEEL if he read that you feel that he is a liar? There's no need for name calling here, Common Sense. Again, did you attend 5th grade?

  • Andrew Slominski (author) said:

    Oh so you're a “he's covering up for the Jews” guy. Get off my site you scum.

  • Paul Denby said:

    Heh - keep it clean, Andrew! No need for personal insults when you're blaming thousands of Americans for 911.

  • Ethan said:

    it looks like your not the only one ringing the siren.

    Georgia congressman warns of Obama dictatorship
    http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D94CDDM...

  • Andrew Slominski (author) said:

    Ah yes, the mental health argument. Sure is a great way to try and shut people up. Hey, if they're mentally unstable then that means we don't have to listen to them, right? It doesn't really matter if other people seem to have the EXACT SAME “paranoid delusion”.

    It also doesn't seem to matter that I posted this article on our site back in July.

  • Ethan said:

    You need to learn to debate people with facts and logic Ryan. What you should have linked to instead was something about Obama clarifying what he meant by his statements. You argue like a child.

    I don't post things because I agree or disagree with them necessarily. I post things because I want to discuss them. It is really annoying when people like you refuse to use their brains and actually present a real argument.

  • Andrew S. (author) said:

    Ah yes, the mental health argument. Sure is a great way to try and shut people up. Hey, if they're mentally unstable then that means we don't have to listen to them, right? It doesn't really matter if other people seem to have the EXACT SAME “paranoid delusion”.

    It also doesn't seem to matter that I posted this article on our site back in July.

  • Ethan said:

    You need to learn to debate people with facts and logic Ryan. What you should have linked to instead was something about Obama clarifying what he meant by his statements. You argue like a child.

    I don't post things because I agree or disagree with them necessarily. I post things because I want to discuss them. It is really annoying when people like you refuse to use their brains and actually present a real argument.

  • Vagina said:

    SUCK MY WEINER YOU FAIL IN LIFE GO BACK TO GERMANYNAZI

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> <pre lang="" line="" escaped="">

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.