“Survival of the Fittest”
I don’t know about you all, but I’m getting a little sick of “green guilt.” Everywhere we turn, someone is telling us that we are sucking life from the planet; that human beings are leaches. In some ways, I agree that humans have perhaps made too large of a foot print on this planet. But, it is ridiculous that the media has co-opted environmentalism, turning health and environmental consciousness into a contest to keep up with the Joneses and be the most “green.”
I am a consumer, especially of cosmetic products. I have been looking for natural products that won’t upset my sensitive and delicate skin. Of course, I’ve looked into products labeled organic. If I were to purchase these natural products in place of all my normal Proctor&Gamble distributed stuff, it would cost hundreds and hundreds of dollars per year. I am constantly reminded by the Green People that parabens and other fillers and preservatives in cosmetic and hygienic products may have harmful health effects. Why is that the only people who can avoid health risks are people who can afford to buy expensive products made by companies like Juice Beauty and Boscia? Everyone else has to stick with Suave and V05 and CoverGirl, which all probably will give us cancer.
I thought about this in relation to our food supply when I read an article on the D+C website yesterday morning. Entitled “Pittsford Family Feels Better with Green Lifestyle,” the article reminded me what the word “fluff” means. I have to agree with many of the posters who have written on the forum for this article: there is no good reason for this article to even have existed. Tips such as turning off the A/C, taking a bike or walking and eating less meat are hardly new ideas. One of the biggest problems I have with this article is its emphasis on eating organic foods. The article says that the featured Pittsford family goes to farm markets, eats little meat and buys only foods free of pesticides and other harmful chemicals–that may work for them because their wallet is a little fatter than other Rochester locals, but many of us simply don’t have this access or freedom to choose foods without pesticides. So this family gets to avoid Genetically Modified food, pesticides, and tote around their proud “I’m green” attitude. The rest of us are just poor, fat, slobs because we aren’t green enough and can never aspire to be.
I think eating fruits and vegetables is great. So is planting a garden at your home. And biking. And walking. Some of us would pass out if not for A/C, but I’m not opposed to energy conservation. I think most of all, what this article has lead to me to believe is that we need to fight for quality food for our entire supply, not just organic (which often has dicey standards set by the FDA). One of our biggest fights will be against Genetically Modified Organisms–currently crops such as corn, tomatoes, sugar, cotton and a few others are genetically modified. We have been told modifying these organisms only has benefits; these crops produce their own pesticides and last longer. But we do not know if there are long-term effects for humans, although we have seen insects and other crops impacted. (I won’t elaborate here, but take, for example, Bt maiz )
Just think about what matters more–ensuring that a tiny portion of all produce (organic) is safe and available to eat for a few individuals at an astronomical cost, or ensuring the safety of all crops around the world.
More info on Bt corn…http://www.scq.ubc.ca/bt-corn-is-it-worth-the-risk/

This is a great article Alicia. I recommended it to http://www.infowars.com because it is an original article and it has some great opinions in it. Focusing on the main food supply is really the way to go. We can win this fight because Europe was successful in getting GMO foods out of the food supply. Africans are also smarter than us at this point because they’ve been letting the seeds stack up and rot at their docks instead of planting that junk.
Please post more articles about GMO foods in the future because this is a critical issue and is winnable in the short term. We must completely discredit Monsanto to stop this madness. Below is a great link called “millions against monsanto”:
http://www.organicconsumers.org/monlink.cfm
Not convinced? Google ‘Monsanto’ and notice how the first link is the official website and everything after that are sites trying to stop them.
By: Andrew Slominski on July 9, 2008
at 9:58 am
There are many reasons organic foods are currently more expensive than conventionally produced foods, but the overriding reason for the price jack up is that these agribusinesses are going against the grain. Sustainable agriculture is not subsidized in the same way that conventional agriculture is. It is expensive to get certified, especially for small-scale operations, and expensive to work against agricultural policies that encourage mono-cropping, excessive amounts of pesticides and insecticides and GMOs. These agribusinesses pass the price increase down to the consumer, understandably so. As more people began to purchase organic, and especially when policy encourages, instead of impedes, organic growing… then prices will fall even lower than they already are (traditional food verse organic is rarely more than a 25 percent mark up).
You seem overwhelmed by the green movement. The intention of the movement shouldn’t (and I think isn’t) to make you feel guilty, but to show us pathways to a more sustainable future. This Pittsford family is obviously clear of student loans and is making decent money. Enough so that they can make very direct changes.
We should feel encouraged by such families, not guilty. The science behind global warming is accurate and lengthly. We are warming our world at a rate in which the Earth hasn’t encountered. We now fix more nitrogen than all ecosystem’s natural pathways combine. We have cultivated our developed half of the world’s green space. It is clear our footprint is absolutely enormous, and that we are ruining the home in which we live. That being said, every aspect of our affluent life is due for a change (whether subtle or dramatic). I think inspired is a better adjective than guilty, for this family recognizes the impact they’re having on our environment, our sustenance, and our taking action to maintain and conserve our well being as a species. This family is a glimpse into a more sustainable future, a future which we should aspire to be a part of, even if we cannot afford it now.
By: Clay on July 14, 2008
at 10:49 pm